Build defensible sample plans for common nonparametric tests. Review assumptions, export results, and inspect sensitivity. Use clear inputs, practical formulas, and instant summary tables.
| Scenario | Test | Effect size | Alpha | Power | Dropout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two independent groups | Mann-Whitney U | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.80 | 10% |
| Paired baseline and follow-up | Wilcoxon signed-rank | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.90 | 12% |
| Three treatment groups | Kruskal-Wallis H | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.80 | 8% |
| Association study | Spearman correlation | 0.35 | 0.05 | 0.85 | 5% |
This tool uses asymptotic planning formulas. They convert familiar power expressions into rank-test targets through an efficiency factor called asymptotic relative efficiency, or ARE.
These are planning approximations. They are useful for early protocol design, grant preparation, and feasibility review.
It estimates recruitment targets for common nonparametric tests. The result is a planning value, not a guarantee. It combines alpha, power, effect size, efficiency, dropout, and rounding.
ARE adjusts a familiar parametric planning expression to reflect rank-test efficiency. It gives a practical bridge when exact closed-form nonparametric planning methods are unavailable or inconvenient.
Use a standardized location effect for Mann-Whitney, a paired standardized effect for Wilcoxon signed-rank, Cohen f style effect for Kruskal-Wallis, and absolute rho for Spearman correlation.
No. It is an asymptotic approximation for planning. Final protocol decisions should consider pilot data, simulation, missingness patterns, unequal variances, and consultation with a statistician.
Use two-sided alpha unless your study question and protocol justify a directional hypothesis before data collection. Two-sided planning is usually the safer default.
The base estimate covers analyzable observations. Dropout inflates recruitment so the final retained sample is closer to the target after losses, withdrawals, or incomplete measurements.
It shows how the adjusted total sample changes across several target power levels while keeping your other assumptions fixed. This helps sensitivity review during planning.
Use a custom value only when you have defensible external evidence, simulation results, or subject-matter guidance supporting a different efficiency assumption for your outcome distribution.
Important Note: All the Calculators listed in this site are for educational purpose only and we do not guarentee the accuracy of results. Please do consult with other sources as well.